FactsGenetics

Identical twins don't have the same fingerprints.

True
Verified11/30/2024
Times Checked1 time
Factuality Score100.0%

Analysis

The statement that identical twins don't have the same fingerprints is supported by multiple credible sources. Identical twins, despite sharing the same DNA, develop unique fingerprints due to environmental factors during their development. This is emphasized in various articles, including those from Healthline, Science Focus, and Live Science, which clarify that while twins may have similar fingerprint characteristics, their fingerprints are not identical. The conflicting information regarding high class/type similarity does not negate the fact that each twin's fingerprints are unique. Therefore, the statement is considered correct.

Sources

Conflicts

they have a high class/type similarity in their fingerprints

Supports

identical twins all have unique fingerprints

Supports

monozygotic twins don't have identical fingerprints

Supports

identical twins do not have matching fingerprints

Supports

Twins have different friction ridge detail on their hands - their finger and palm prints are not the same.

Supports

No two fingerprints are the same

Supports

identical twins – who have the same DNA sequence and tend to share a very similar appearance – have slightly different fingerprints

Similar Statements

The Earth is round.

Factuality Score95.0%

Water boils at 100 degrees Celsius.

Factuality Score98.0%

The sky is blue.

Factuality Score90.0%

The sky is blue.

Factuality Score90.0%

The sky is blue.

Factuality Score90.0%

The sky is blue.

Factuality Score90.0%

The sky is blue.

Factuality Score90.0%